Educological Principles of Training Experts for the Education System of Ukraine: Achievements and Prospects
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The problem of introducing expert examination of education management is relevant and pressing for Ukraine in the context of assessment of education quality at all levels. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the effectiveness of the model of training experts in the field of education on the basis of educology at Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: When processing the obtained empirical data, statistical methods were used to compare the indicators of the Master’s student survey before and after the course of educology according to Pearson’s criteria, Fisher’s test, and the Mann-Whitney-U test Venn diagram. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: Training experts in the field of education is based on the model: 1) mastering the basics of educology and its components; 2) mastering the methodology of the examination and the ethical standards of its implementation; and 3) mastering the specifics of the educational segment which is subject to expert examination. RESEARCH RESULTS: The study confirms the efficiency of the developed model of experts’ training in the field of education. Educology provides the system, purposefulness and effectiveness for such training. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The results of the study provide an opportunity to see the feasibility of the first level of the model, which involves mastering the basics of educology; the second level, which is aimed at mastering the components of the educational program, which reveal the methodology and specifics of expert activities; and the third level, which makes it possible to differentiate the suggested directions of such training, namely: measuring and monitoring the quality of education, education management, educational economics, and educational law
References
Altrichter, H. (2010). Theory and Evidence on Governance: Conceptual and Empirical Strategies of Research on Governance in Education. European Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 147‑158.
Batechko, N. (2017). Metodolohiia osvtiolohii: synerhentychnyi aspect [Methodology of osvitology: synergetic aspect]. Osvitolohichnyi Dyskurs, 1‑2, 16‑17, 1‑3.
Beywl, W. & Speer, S. (2004). Das A‑B‑C der wirkungsorientierten Evaluation. Institut für Evaluation.
Brandt, T. (2009). Evaluation in Deutschland. Professionalisierungsstand und ‑perspektiven.Waxmann.
Cronbach, L.J. (1980). Toward Reform of Programme Evaluation: Aims, Methods and Institutional Arrangements. Jossey‑Bass.
Klieme, E. (2004). Was sind Kompetenzen und wie lassen sie sich messen? Pädagogik, 4(6), 10‑13.
Machynska, N. (2016). Mizhdystsyplinarnyi dyskurs pidhotovky maibutnoho vykladacha v umovakh mahistratury [Іnterdisciplinary discourse of the future teachers training in the magistracy]. Neperervna Profesiina Osvita:Teoria ta Praktyka, 3‑4, 48‑49, 35‑38.
Maritzen, N. (1996). Sich selbst und anderen Rechenschaft geben. Pädagogik, 1, 25‑29.
Ogneviuk, V. & Sysoieva, S. (2015). Training of education experts in Ukraine: experimental interdisciplinary program. The Advanced Science Journal, 6, 98‑103.
Ogneviuk, V. & Sysoieva, S. (eds.). (2017). Vstup do osvitolohii: Navchalnyi posibnyk [Introduction to educоlogy: a textbook].VP Edelveis.
Ponomarenko, N.H. (2015). Ekspertna diyalnist v haluzi shkilnoyi osvity: dosvid Nimechchyny ta Avstriyi [Expert activities in the field of school education: the experience of Germany and Austria]. Pedahohichnyy Protsess:Teoriya i Praktyka, 5‑6, 125‑129.
Posch, P. & Altrichter, H. (1997). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Qualitätssicherung und Qualität‑sentwicklung im Schulwesen. (Bildungsforschung des Bundesministeriums für Unterricht und kulturelle Angelegenheiten 12). Studienverlag.
Sysoieva, S. (2012). Sfera osvity yak obyekt doslidzhennya [The field of education as an object of study]. Osvitologiya, 1, 22‑29.
Sysoieva, S. (ed.). (2020). Yevropejskyj prostir vyshhoyi osvity: parametry yakosti ta ekspertyzy: navchalnyj posibnyk [The European area of higher education: quality parameters and expertise: a textbook]. Ministerstvo osviti i nauki Ukraїni.
Tryhub, I. (2019). Pidhotovka ekspertiv u haluzi osvity: dosvid Skhidnoi Yevropy [Training of experts in the field of education: the experience of East Europe]. Neperervna Profesiina Osvita: Teoria i Praktyka, 1, 88‑92.
Copyright (c) 2021 HORIZONS OF EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:
